I won’t be posting daily for now, but if something strikes me in the paper I’ll throw it up. In the meantime, you are still welcome to comment and suggest other resources that you come across. Thanks for your clicks and comments.
temporary hiatus
December 4, 2008 by sdreesecitizen journalism in mumbai
November 30, 2008 by sdreeseThe terrorist attacks in India gave rise to a spurt of citizen journalism, using Twitter, Flickr, cell phones, cell cameras, and other easy to use tools.
If news is a conversation among citizens concerning what they need to know to function together, new social network technologies like Twitter, which at one time seemed like a strictly superficial time-waster, now provide a platform of far-flung communities to keep up with what’s going on (particularly in times of crisis and lack of traditional media information, such as in Mumbai).
the military-industrial-media complex
November 30, 2008 by sdreeseOnce more on the theme of transparency, an extensive review in today’s Sunday Times about a retired general, turned lobbyist, turned favored media consultant for NBC News and talking head. Gen. Barry McCaffrey, although arguing he is objective given his criticism of execution of policy in Iraq, nevertheless advocates, as this investigation demonstrates, views in line with his business interests
transparency about your money
November 28, 2008 by sdreeseThe Wall St. Journal has been sued for publishing negative performance information about a big hedge firm, with the Journal claiming it properly covered a matter of public concern.
Big investment companies often seek to work in private, but then how is the public ever to know how they are doing? These days one could argue that lack of transparency in the financial world is largely to blame for the crisis, and the Journal (regardless of the slant of its U.S. editorial page) tries to play it straight when it comes to money. Investors expect it.
new source for health news
November 24, 2008 by sdreeseGiven the difficulty in finding unconflicted health news (posted below), or much health news at all on a topic of great and growing concern to the audience, the Kaiser Foundation is experimenting with a new non-profit health news service. As traditional journalism has found it difficult to do an adequate job of providing the resources for important stories, the philanthropic world has stepped into the breach.
el mozote writer’s latest story
November 22, 2008 by sdreesetransparency in health news
November 22, 2008 by sdreeseAn NPR health science show host has received large payments from drug companies, a fact not revealed to the audience. Like the undisclosed ties of military contractors to media talking-head generals, these extensive payments to health communicators (in this case, a kind of “journalist”) threaten the credibility of the news. Few vested interests are as wealthy and able to direct the information environment as the defense and health industries.
image control
November 21, 2008 by sdreeseIn war and conflict, the military has control over a story in hot demand and can determine matters of access for the media. Security concerns play a role of course in dictating who is provided what information, but often image sensitivity and putting a positive spin on operations take precedence. Hollywood works the same.
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt have a story the public wants, and to the extent they control the access they, particularly Jolie, can dictate (with great strategic skill) the terms of coverage, with the goal of promoting their own causes and burnishing the celebrity image.


the extinction of the news anchor?
December 1, 2008 by sdreeseAt least on the local television news level, the veteran highly paid news anchors are becoming fewer in number. They cost too much for what they propose to deliver–the human face of the local news brand.
In the past, the thinking was always that tv ratings were driven by subjective feelings of attachment to the anchor figure, making him or her worth the high price. Now they run contrary to how audiences consume media, more interactively and in their own order, and fewer viewers need an authority figure to guide them through the linear mix of news, sports, and weather. One could argue that their years of experience with the community represent a loss, but how many were actually using that experience in any substantive manner? Had they done so, they might have justified the salaries.
Posted in news & comment, trends in news | 1 Comment »